View Contact ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de Details
📋 Contact & Network Overview
- Contact: 0x8D41788E90924014 Carsten Otto <[email protected]> url:ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de proof:uri-rsa ciissversion:2
- Hash: e696a7f0f50867f475ef35027232c928
- Countries:
Germany (9)
Network Summary:
- Bandwidth Capacity: ~4.71 Gbit/s (4.71 Gbit/s guard)
- Network Influence: 0.42% of overall consensus weight (0.81% guard)
- Network Position: Guard-only (9 total relays, 9 guards)
📊 Operator Intelligence
- Network Diversity: Okay, 2 networks
- Geographic Diversity: Poor, 1 country
- Infrastructure Diversity: Poor, 1 platform, 1 version
- Bandwidth Capacity Measurements: 9/9 relays measured by authorities
- Performance Insights: Overall CW/BW: 1408. +9% higher than 1294 network average. 78th percentile with 940 median.
- Guard CW/BW: 1408. +59% higher than 886 network average. 79th percentile with 1016 median.
- Operational Maturity: Operating since 2021-07-17 (expanded through 2024-05-17)
- Version Compliance: All, 9 (100%) compliant
- Version Status: All, 9 (100%) recommended
⏰ Relay Reliability
- Overall Uptime:
30d 100.0% (9 relays), 6mo 99.8% (9 relays), 1y 98.5% (9 relays), 5y 96.9% (9 relays)
- Outlier (6mo: ≥2σ 99.6% from μ 99.8%): 1 relays out of 9 relays (11.1%)Exceptional: 1 relay
- Network Uptime (6mo): 5th Pct: 69%, 25th Pct: 98%, Operator: 100%, 50th Pct: 100%, 75th Pct: 100%, 90th Pct: 100%, 95th Pct: 100%, 99th Pct: 100%
- Offline: 0 relays
Reliability data available for 9/9 relays, from 2025-10-20 14:00:00 UTC
🚀 Bandwidth Reliability
Operator Performance:
- Average Relay Throughput: 6mo 261.35 Mbit/s avg (9 relays), 1y 229.05 Mbit/s avg (9 relays), 5y 207.97 Mbit/s avg (9 relays)
-
Performance Analysis (6mo):
- Stability: Good (Coefficient of Variation: 33.4% = 87.23 Mbit/s σ / 261.35 Mbit/s μ)
- Trend: Decline (-13.2%) for most recent (Aug 18 - Oct 18, 2025) vs least recent (Apr 18 - Jun 18, 2025)
- Capacity Utilization: 49% of all-time peak capacity (current 6mo avg vs all-time 1yr peak)
- Bandwidth Outliers: 1 relay with unusual bandwidth patterns, Low: COtto
Network Comparison:
- Network Position: Top 25% (75th-95th percentile)
- Network Contribution: 6mo 2.35 Gbit/s avg (183 days), 1y 2.06 Gbit/s avg (183 days), 5y 649.95 Mbit/s avg (156 days)
Bandwidth Stability:
Great (Top 25% most stable),
Good (25-50% most stable),
Variable (25-50% most stable),
Extreme (Bottom 10% most variable)
Reliability data available for 9/9 relays, from 2025-10-20 14:00:00 UTC
🏆 AROI Champion Rankings
4 winning AROI Champions Dashboard categories:
- 🛡️ #11 Guard Heavyweight Master — Guard Heavyweight Master
- 🛡️ #22 Guard Gatekeepers — Guard Gatekeepers
- 🚀 #24 Bandwidth Capacity Champion — Bandwidth Capacity Champion
- ⚖️ #25 Network Heavyweight — Network Heavyweight
🏷️ Flag Reliability
Flag-specific uptime percentages (1M/6M/1Y/5Y):
🛡️ Stable Operation:
100.0% / 99.8% / 98.5% / 95.3%
⚡ Fast Relay:
100.0% / 99.8% / 98.2% / 96.7%
🟢 Running Operation:
100.0% / 99.8% / 98.5% / 96.9%
🛡️ Entry Guard:
100.0% / 99.8% / 90.9% / 89.7%
📂 Hidden Services:
83.0% / 91.8% / 85.2% / 82.9%
📁 Directory Services:
100.0% / 99.8% / 98.5% / 96.9%
Excellent (>99%),
Below average (<μ of network),
Poor (≥2σ from network μ)
, from 2025-10-20 14:00:00 UTC
🚀 Flag Bandwidth Performance
Flag-specific bandwidth averages (6M/1Y/5Y):
🛡️ Entry Guard:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
⚡ Fast Relay:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
🟢 Running:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
📁 Hidden Service Directory:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
🎯 Stable Relay:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
📋 Version 2 Directory:
261.35 Mbit/s / 229.05 Mbit/s / 207.97 Mbit/s
High performance (>1.5x μ),
Below average (<μ of network),
Poor (≥2σ from network μ)
Last updated: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:02:18 GMT. Refreshed every 30 minutes from the Tor directory authorities via Tor Project's onionoo API.
| Nickname | BW Cap (4.71 Gbit/s) | Uptime/Downtime | Uptime (1M/6M/1Y/5Y) | Flag Uptime (1M/6M/1Y/5Y) | IPv4 | Flags | Country | AS Number | AS Name | Platform | First Seen | Last Restarted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 629.81 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 1d 18h ago | 100.0%/99.7%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.4% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 1d 18h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 615.49 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 2d 6h ago | 100.0%/99.8%/98.3%/96.4% | —/—/89.7%/88.6% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 2d 6h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 593.58 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 2d 8h ago | 100.0%/99.7%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.5% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 2d 8h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 588.74 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 2d 7h ago | 100.0%/99.8%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.5% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 2d 8h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 565.48 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 2d 7h ago | 100.0%/99.7%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.5% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 2d 7h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 565.21 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 1d 23h ago | 100.0%/99.7%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.5% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 1w ago | 1w 1d 23h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 560.64 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 1d 20h ago | 100.0%/99.8%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/87.7% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 1d 20h ago | |
| FTPhalifaxRWTH (9) | 517.08 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 1d 18h ago | 100.0%/99.8%/98.3%/96.6% | —/—/89.7%/88.7% | 137.226.34.45 |
|
DE
|
AS47610 | RWTH Aachen University | Linux | 1y 5mo 6d ago | 1w 1d 18h ago | |
| COtto (9) | 69.92 Mbit/s ✓ | UP 1w 2d 13h ago | 100.0%/100.0%/100.0%/99.8% | Match | 157.90.112.145 |
|
DE
|
AS24940 | Hetzner Online GmbH | Linux | 4y 3mo 6d ago | 1w 2d 13h ago |